POTUS jammin'
Juan
juan.g71 at gmail.com
Sat Nov 29 12:29:51 PST 2014
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:59:50 -0800
coderman <coderman at gmail.com> wrote:
> > If that were the case, then a shielded, passive receiver ought to
> > be OK,
>
> a shielded, passive receiver would be overwhelmed by the brute flood.
>
>
Excuse my ignorance, but wouldn't a shielded receiver be a
useless receiver?
If you shield a receiver from a jamming signal, you are also
shielding it from the signal you want to receive? What am I
missing?
More information about the Testlist
mailing list