[Dewayne-Net] Airport ID checks legally enforced?

[Dewayne Hendricks]

Airport ID checks legally enforced?

By Declan McCullagh
<http://news.com.com/Airport+ID+checks+legally+enforced/
2100-7348_3-5987820.html>

Story last modified Thu Dec 08 12:40:00 PST 2005

SAN FRANCISCO--A federal appeals court wrestled Thursday with what
seems to be a straightforward question: Can Americans be required to
show ID on a commercial airline flight?
John Gilmore, an early employee of Sun Microsystems and co-founder of
the Electronic Frontier Foundation, says the answer should be "no."
The libertarian millionaire sued the Bush administration, which
claims that the ID requirement is necessary for security but has
refused to identify any actual regulation requiring it.

A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals seemed
skeptical of the Bush administration's defense of secret laws and
regulations but stopped short of suggesting that such a rule would be
necessarily unconstitutional.

"How do we know there's an order?" Judge Thomas Nelson asked.
"Because you said there was?"

Replied Joshua Waldman, a staff attorney for the Department of
Justice: "We couldn't confirm or deny the existence of an order."
Even though government regulations required his silence, Waldman
said, the situation did seem a "bit peculiar."

"This is America," said James Harrison, a lawyer representing
Gilmore. "We do not have secret laws. Period." Harrison stressed that
Gilmore was happy to go through a metal detector.

Gilmore sued the federal government after being told he could not fly
without ID from Oakland, Calif., to Washington, D.C., which he said
he was doing to exercise his First Amendment right to petition the
government for a redress of grievances. U.S. District Judge Susan
Illston dismissed (PDF) his case in March 2004, ruling that Gilmore
had "numerous other methods of reaching Washington."

Oral arguments on Thursday, which lasted about 40 minutes, returned
repeatedly to that point. Judge Richard Paez suggested that when your
ID is requested at an airport, "You can always leave."

Waldman, the Justice Department attorney, said that as long as no
commercial airline flight is required, Americans "can assemble
wherever they want. They can petition wherever they want." He added,
"I'm not aware of any right to travel anonymously."

Two cases that were mentioned on Thursday could provide a glimpse
into how the appeals court will rule. In one, decided in 2004, the
U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that police could arrest anyone they
stopped who refused to show ID. In the other, U.S. v. Davis, the 9th
Circuit said in 1973 that airport searches were permissible as a form
of administrative screening.

It's unclear what will happen next. Because of a procedural twist
involving lawsuits against federal agencies, the district court
concluded that only an appeals court enjoys authority to resolve some
aspects of the dispute. But the 9th Circuit judges also could, if
they side with Gilmore, send the case back to the lower court for a
full trial.

On the courthouse steps after the arguments, Gilmore said he felt
confident about the case and welcomed a verbal concession from the
Justice Department. "I was glad the government admitted it was
'peculiar' and Orwellian to make secret laws," Gilmore said.

The Justice Department has said it could identify the secret law
under seal, which would be available to the 9th Circuit but not
necessarily Gilmore's lawyers. But any public description would not
be permitted, the department said.

Weblog at: <http://weblog.warpspeed.com>



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as eugen at leitl.org
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/

----- End forwarded message -----
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820            http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]