CDR: RE: Wired News tech scorecard for U.S. House of Representatives
David Honig
honig at sprynet.com
Thu Oct 26 09:34:24 PDT 2000
At 01:21 AM 10/26/00 -0400, Neil Johnson wrote:
>> Its called 'parenting' but most are too busy, so they ask the State, or
>> machines (censorware, v-chips, rating systems, etc.) under others'
>control,
>> to do it instead.
>>
>
>Any parent who lets a child have a TV or a computer in their bedroom now
>days is nuts.
Yep. And any parent who relies on v-chips is *abdicating responsibility*
by depending on someone else's ratings. Similarly with internet
content ratings or MPAA filtering (PG vs R) or FCC filtering (content vs.
broadcast time, or their stupid labels on broadcasts).
To Bear: my reference top "machines under others' control" means
censorware which hides its list of sites from parents.
Certainly relying on other editors (filters) is useful, but parents have to
pick the editors carefully. This is not a political but a personal
responsability issue; as far as the state goes, no filtering can be
*imposed* by others in a free society. My point was that a parent
voluntarily chosing
some black-box default is not doing their job.
\begin{political} A parent forced to use filtered feeds needs to eliminate
that force, then that imposed filter.
Anyone can open up a ratings system and filtering tools.
And they are free to have open or secret lists and rules. You
are free to pick and choose raters you like ---just like you can
chose to eat kosher-rated, or 'organic'-rated, or whatever.
But the filters can have no support from the State, for that is censorship.
Freedom + filters = lame parenting;
State + filters = censorship.
\end{political}
>However, that's my responsibility as parent, and not something I desire to
>give up to anyone else non-voluntarily.
Precisely.
>As for the V-Chip. I've seen enough programs rated "For All Ages" that are
>not appropriate for young kids to know that they are worthless.
Yes.
Plus the insult of being forced to pay for it. Along with CALEA,
locatable cell phones, parental advisory labels, etc.
....
This post is rated:
VG for reference to government violence
NS for no spam countermeasure schemes
NG for no mention of geodesic global economies
NK for no observations about who needs killing
NC for no alternate-universe mis-physics
NE for no spurious Emily Dickinson grille ciphers
More information about the Testlist
mailing list