A possible solution
Aron Freed
s009amf at discover.wright.edu
Sun Nov 27 17:35:29 PST 1994
On Sun, 27 Nov 1994, Mike McNally wrote:
> So why pick specifically on cryptography? Why not increase penalties
> for criminals who in their crimes are found to have used:
>
> * computers;
> * pagers;
> * cellular phones;
> * Casio watches with multiple alarms;
> * Cars with power windows;
> * Velcro-fastening tennis shoes;
> * Gore-Tex jackets;
> * Ibuprofen pain relievers;
> * Fat-free ice cream;
Why don't we stick to the topic? Do you have an intelligent reply or are
you going to shoot your mouth off? Or Maybe you can share something
better with us, all knowing and wise one.
Aaron
More information about the Testlist
mailing list