[Nml-wg] Lifetime
Jeroen van der Ham
vdham at uva.nl
Wed Mar 13 11:12:13 EDT 2013
Hi,
On 13 Mar 2013, at 11:07, Roman Łapacz <romradz at man.poznan.pl> wrote:
>
> Presence of start and/or end elements in Lifetime is not optional according to the XSD schema.
>
This gives me the opportunity to also apply some new text that Richard suggested for the Syntaxes section:
> These syntaxes follow the model as defined in section~\ref{s:schema}, should there be any inconsistencies between the syntaxes, the definitions in section~\ref{s:schema} take precedence over the syntaxes.
;-)
But more seriously, the schema document has an explicit MAY for the start and end time, so it should be optional.
Jeroen.
More information about the nml-wg
mailing list