[Nmc-wg] Result Code Redux - One last issue
Jason Zurawski
zurawski at internet2.edu
Fri Sep 23 04:32:34 CDT 2011
Gang;
In typing up the final version of the status codes into the document, I
hit upon a snag. Here is an example of what was proposed in the prior mail:
http://schemas.ogf.org/nmc/2011/09/status/informational/protocol version/
This goes against our typical method of constructing namespaces. I
would suggest we do this instead:
http://schemas.ogf.org/nmc/status/informational/protocol version/2011/09/
Or even better using:
201109
or
20110923
As the 'version' string. I am attaching an updated document going with
the first suggestion, I prefer the last best of all. Other opinions?
Thanks;
-jason
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 20110923-NMCResultCodes.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 113881 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nmc-wg/attachments/20110923/fa6cbaba/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the Nmc-wg
mailing list