[glue-wg] FW: [bug #20804] GlueCEInfoContactString should be a real URL
Gabriele Garzoglio
garzogli at fnal.gov
Wed Apr 4 13:03:06 CDT 2007
Hi,
I don't think that we are very resilient to any changes, at this point,
but we have to take a decision. By the way, is the lcg broker going to
distinguish the new attribute value and not crash?
glitece:// seams appropriate to me.
Cheers
Gabriele
Burke, S (Stephen) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I seem to have lost track of this ... we still need to say what the
> (pseudo-)URL should be for the glite CE. Something like
> glitece://host.name/blah-pbs? We need a scheme name which isn't going
> to clash with anything else, and offhand I can't think of anything
> better - the interface is actually condor-C but that might be needed
> for other things.
>
> Stephen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Gabriele Garzoglio
> *Sent:* 28 March 2007 17:03
> *To:* Burke, S (Stephen)
> *Cc:* glue-wg at ogf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [glue-wg] FW: [bug #20804] GlueCEInfoContactString
> should be a real URL
>
> Hi,
> having a URL for each different syntax is probably a good approach.
> Cheers
> Gabriele
>
> Burke, S (Stephen) wrote:
>> Gabriele Garzoglio [mailto:garzogli at fnal.gov] said:
>>
>>> I would like for the GlueCEInfoContactString to be the
>>> GRAM-URL for the resource.
>>>
>>
>> For the LCG CE that's OK, but the glite CE doesn't have a gram interface
>> (apart from fork on the CE headnode). We can either invent a URL for
>> that or leave it unset. In the future it's possible that some glite CEs
>> will have gram as well, but at the moment it isn't supported.
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/glue-wg/attachments/20070404/01a63470/attachment.html
More information about the glue-wg
mailing list