[DRMAA-WG] Torque/PBS DRMAA - state changes notification
Rajic, Hrabri
hrabri.rajic at intel.com
Tue May 8 10:58:05 CDT 2007
This issue is very likely to be in the DRMAA trackers. If not, we need
to create it and add the comments from this thread.
It is a future work, so there is no impact on the current DRMAA-R
candidate document.
Hrabri
>-----Original Message-----
>From: drmaa-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:drmaa-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On
Behalf
>Of Peter Troeger
>Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 11:09 AM
>To: DRMAA Working Group
>Subject: Re: [DRMAA-WG] Torque/PBS DRMAA - state changes notification
>
>As Dan said, this is already possible by polling the library. Does
>that issue take about callback functionality ?
>
>Peter.
>
>
>> We already deliberated this one, ad nausuem. I was on the pro side,
>> but I was the only one. On the up side, the drmaa_wait() semantics
>> allow the use of DRMAA_JOB_IDS_SESSION_ANY to easily implement
>> notifications.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> On May 1, 2007, at 7:13 PM, Rajic, Hrabri wrote:
>>
>>> Issue:
>>>
>>> We believe that a new routine for job status change monitoring, e.g.
>>> transition into the RUNNING state, would provide a usefully feedback
>>> for
>>> the end user.
>>> ---------------
>>>
>>> We are talking about notifications here, right? This needs to be
>>> deliberated in future versions.
>>>
>>> -Hrabri
>>> --
>>> drmaa-wg mailing list
>>> drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
>>
>> --
>> drmaa-wg mailing list
>> drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
>
>--
> drmaa-wg mailing list
> drmaa-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
More information about the drmaa-wg
mailing list