[DRMAA-WG] DRMAA conformance rules
Peter Troeger
peter.troeger at hpi.uni-potsdam.de
Tue Jan 2 14:29:52 CST 2007
Thanks for the editing. I would love to mention the test suite, but
only as suggestion. Otherwise, we would need to establish a better
process for the test suite maintenance and coverage.
I will include the updated text in the IDL spec.
Peter.
Am 22.12.2006 um 18:23 schrieb Daniel Templeton:
> Peter,
>
> Some edits:
>
> A language binding document SHOULD be called “DRMAA 1.0” in its
> document title, if all interface and mapping rules and suggestions
> from this document are addressed in the language binding. An
> implementation of the DRMAA API for a particular programming
> language and DRM system is “DRMAA 1.0 compliant”, if the API
> implementation and behavior conforms to a “DRMAA 1.0” language
> binding document, or to this document. In case of conflicts, the
> language-specific binding specification has precedence.
>
>
> Did you want to mention the compatibility tests for certain languages?
>
> Daniel
>
> Peter Troeger wrote:
>> Some updated version:
>>
>> A language binding document SHOULD be called “DRMAA 1.0” in its
>> document title, if all interface and mapping rules and
>> suggestions from this document are considered in the language
>> binding. An implementation of the DRMAA API for a particular
>> programming language and DRM system is “DRMAA 1.0 compliant”, if
>> the API implementation and behavior conforms to a “DRMAA 1.0”
>> language binding document, or this document. In case of
>> conflicts, the language-specific binding specification has
>> precedence.
>>
>> It now provides a clearer definition of 'conformance'.
>>
>> Peter.
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 22.12.2006 um 10:27 schrieb Peter Troeger:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I got a comment for the IDL spec that we do not have a clear
>>> declaration of "conformance". Therefore, here is my suggestion for
>>> some text block in the IDL spec:
>>>
>>> -- snip
>>>
>>> A language binding document is allowed to use “DRMAA 1.0” in its
>>> document title, if all interface and mapping rules and suggestions
>>> from this document are considered in the language binding. An
>>> implementation of the DRMAA API for a particular programming
>>> language
>>> and DRM system can be called “DRMAA 1.0 compliant”, if (A) the API
>>> implementation and behavior confirms to a “DRMAA 1.0” language
>>> binding document, or this document. In case of conflicts, the
>>> language-specific binding specification has precedence.
>>>
>>> -- snip
>>>
>>> What do you think ?
>>> Peter.
>>> --
>>> drmaa-wg mailing list
>>> drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
>>>
>>
>> --
>> drmaa-wg mailing list
>> drmaa-wg at ogf.org
>> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg
>>
>
More information about the drmaa-wg
mailing list