[DRMAA-WG] [SAGA-RG] drmaa public comments
Andre Merzky
andre at merzky.net
Wed May 2 16:59:17 CDT 2007
Hi Hrabri, DRMAAs,
Gregory Newby put the errata proposal online by now, its
linked on the front page of the editor project. Direkt
link:
http://forge.ogf.org/short/ggf-editor/errata
Again, that document is in draft state. Feedback is
probably welcome in any stage, but public comment will
open sometime next week (I think).
Cheers,
Andre.
Quoting [Hrabri Rajic] (May 02 2007):
> Subject: RE: [SAGA-RG] drmaa public comments
> From: "Rajic, Hrabri" <hrabri.rajic at intel.com>
> To: Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net>
>
> Hi Andre,
>
> --- Following up on your replay ---
>
> I am not sure if its relevant to the discussion, but anyway:
>
> the GFSG is in the process of discussing an errata process.
> That should enter public comment around OGF20. That process
> does not cover how to coordinate implementation versions,
> but should allow you to manage errata lists in a fairly
> lightweight process.
>
> The process is not yet agreed upon, but I probably can post
> the draft if there is interest.
> --- end of replay ------
>
>
> My mail is kind of messed up, but I have seen your post via DRMAA-WG
> e-mail archive.
>
> Yes, please post the draft regarding the errata process.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Hrabri
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>> Subject: [SAGA-RG] drmaa public comments
>> From: saga-rg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:saga-rg-bounces at ogf.org]
>> On Behalf Of Andre Merzky
>> To: SAGA RG
>>
>> You may want to have a look at the DRMAA mailing list
>> archive from this month:
>>
>> http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/drmaa-wg/2007-May/thread.html
>>
>> The DRMAA group got a number of comments in respect to their
>> interop document (I believe), which raise several issues
>> which are also interesting for SAGA. In general, SAGA seems
>> already to address all of these issues. Nice :-)
>>
>> Cheers, Andre.
>>
--
"XML is like violence: if it does not help, use more."
More information about the drmaa-wg
mailing list