[DFDL-WG] Alternate Initiators?
Steve Hanson
smh at uk.ibm.com
Wed Feb 27 13:12:37 EST 2013
See the property description in the DFDL spec for dfdl:initiator. It can
be a space-separated list (there are several DFDL properties like this).
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, Data Format Description Language (DFDL)
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh at uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
From: "Garriss Jr., James P." <jgarriss at mitre.org>
To: "dfdl-wg at ogf.org" <dfdl-wg at ogf.org>,
Date: 27/02/2013 17:48
Subject: [DFDL-WG] Alternate Initiators?
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces at ogf.org
Consider the following IMF headers:
Message-ID:
<CACQ76nh2VDypuwm1aHc1-s8ZmmyXg8XEosS6af6yurkVdT+8QQ at mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <208E8372-A9D9-468A-9B4B-BD97ED28F64C at garriss.org>
Notice the difference:
Message-ID:
vs
Message-Id:
Per the RFC, only the first is legal, but both are used in practice, and
we’d like to allow either. In our DFDL schema, “Message-ID” is an
initiator, but suddenly we have two alternate initiators for the same
element.
How we model this in DFDL?
TIA--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg at ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/dfdl-wg/attachments/20130227/3a97ec69/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the dfdl-wg
mailing list