imaginary halting problem was Re: [spam][crazy][spam] imaginary code resembling trained dissociation

[Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many]

On 7/9/23, Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many
<gmkarl at gmail.com> wrote:
> two branches: 1. does this disprove the indeterminability of the
> halting problem if we ignore that g() could pathologically correctly
> pass the private data, and to what degree? 2. what about the situation
> where g() pathologically correctly passes the private data? f() could
> still detect this, and wouldn’t know what to do: maybe access to
> further private data, and it calls itself recursively?
>
> okay for 2 i think there’s a way to make it work if we assume
> cryptography can work.

ok um so we make the private data unknown to both g() and f()
and we assume that we can send nonreproducible data to g() that proves
it is in an outer simulation, i guess