USA 2024 Elections Thread

[grarpamp]

> https://twitter.com/ElectionWiz
> https://twitter.com/RNCResearch
> https://twitter.com/LibsOfTikTok
> https://twitter.com/greg_price11
> https://americanprinciplesproject.org/media/new-app-report-exposes-origins-influence-transgender-leviathan/


Double case of Woke goes broke...


WaPo Corrects OpEd Conflating Lack Of Black Argentinian Footballers
With "History Of Black Erasure"

Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

The Washington Post has been forced to issue a correction to an op-ed
that asked ‘Why doesn’t Argentina have more black players in their
World Cup lineup?’ after Argentinian people pointed out that the
country is overwhelmingly white and not obsessed with virtue
signalling about race.

The piece claimed that it is a ‘myth’ that Argentina is a white
nation, with the author Erika Denise Edwards, an associate professor
at the University of Texas at El Paso, suggesting her rantings uncover
a “history of Black erasure in Argentina.”

    A history of Black erasure in Argentina!! Check out my article!
https://t.co/cSyaYaETt8
    — Erika Edwards (@Prof_Edwards) December 10, 2022

In the piece Edwards argues that in the 18th century, a third of
Argentina’s population was black and that since then there has been an
agenda to ‘whiten’ the country.

“They believed that to join the ranks of Germany, France and England,
Argentina had to displace its black population — both physically and
culturally,” she further asserts.

She also points to census figures from 2010, claiming they prove that
“roughly one percent” of Argentina’s population of 46 million is
black.

After people pointed out that this is just not true, The Washington
Post issued a correction noting that the actual number was “far less
than” one percent.

    The Washington Post opinion piece complaining that there are no
black players on Argentina’s team has been corrected after the fact,
to note that “far less than 1%” of the Argentine population is black.
https://t.co/G7B5BO8LJO pic.twitter.com/kSBhjTRoV9
    — Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) December 12, 2022

    This piece is full of inconsistencies and misinterpretations, it
is evident that the person who wrote it has no knowledge of Argentine
culture and never lived in Argentina.
    — Sara Stewart Brown (@Kiwita) December 10, 2022

    You can't apply an American perspective to this, @washingtonpost.
The obsession to put everything through a lens that fits your world
view in deeply troubling. In your article, you demonstrate a complete
lack of understanding of the Indigenous, and Hispanic history of
Argentina https://t.co/YE3NjQz9cr
    — Nico Slobinsky (@nicoslobinsky) December 10, 2022

    Just came back to laugh at Washington Post….

    Washington Post- Argentina is racist because they don’t have black
players in their team.

    Washington Post - Sorry we didn’t know there are no black people
in Argentina.

    This is a paper funded by Bezos, and this is their research
    — Whyteknight (@whyteknight07) December 12, 2022

    So fewer than 150,000 in a country of 46 million. And that's
including women and all men who are not between the ages of about 18
and 35, which is the approximate age window for players of this
caliber. https://t.co/oSppma35R9
    — Noam Blum (@neontaster) December 12, 2022

    You just gathered one sided data that would confirm your bias and
your preconceived idea of Blacks in Argentina.
    — Pedro Bartholomai (@hansenribera) December 13, 2022

    These pieces are always written by people who know 0 about
football but a lot about woke

    Are @WashingtonPost suggesting there are good black Argentine
players not being selected for the team due to racism? Who are they?

    No footballing nation leaves great players out due to race
https://t.co/EDJSFlbLiA
    — Ben Harris-Quinney (@B_HQ) December 11, 2022

Others noted that real life isn’t a Disney movie where each character
is a different race:

    Because we are a country, not a Disney movie. https://t.co/k8Lps8PgW2
    — La Libertad Avanza (@LLibertadAvanza) December 10, 2022

    La estúpida nota del @washingtonpost sobre la falta de negros en
la selección argentina me dejó asqueado. Estados Unidos vive
obsesionado con las razas, Argentina no. Estados Unidos eligió
mantenerlas separadas, Argentina las mezcló. Pero insisten en exportar
sus neurosis.
    — Gonzalo Garcés (@GonzaloGarces5) December 10, 2022

Translation: “The stupid note from [Washington Post] about the lack of
blacks in the Argentine team left me disgusted. The United States is
obsessed with race, Argentina is not. The United States chose to keep
them separate, Argentina mixed them. But they insist on exporting
their neuroses.”

    You have studied so many years for this article? You clearly have
to study more.

    You judgde Latinos and Latin America countries without
understanding geography and history and so much more.

    Do not transfer your racist problems to US.
    — Pilar (@piluogorman) December 13, 2022

    There is nothing that I stated that is factually incorrect.--EDE
@FoxNewsDigital https://t.co/a95415w7wE
    — Erika Edwards (@Prof_Edwards) December 14, 2022

    Do something please, this can't be tolerated anymore! There HAS to
be black players in EVERY SINGLE soccer team of the world. Save us oh,
great expert of racial identities! https://t.co/47KSABZVNp
pic.twitter.com/7k8IMxVsql
    — Cripto Moneda (@criptomonedaz) December 13, 2022

The obsession with diversity and race in national sports is purely an
American and British phenomenon. People in other countries are not
concerned with obsessing about skin colour over skill and talent.

    Thoughts on the BBC lamenting the English women’s football team
having too many white players.

    Yes, this actually happened.https://t.co/uxaRdX2RQr
    — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) July 15, 2022





Florida Subpoenas Nearly Two Dozen Organizations Pushing Hormones,
Transgender Surgeries For Children

The state of Florida has subpoenaed almost two dozen medical and
academic organizations which are pushing transgender sex change
treatments for children, the Daily Caller reports, citing an ongoing
lawsuit against a new Medicaid rule.

The subpoenas, issued by the Florida Agency for Health Care
Administration (AHCA), and which seek information about internal
decision-making processes and leadership structures for pushing
hormone treatments and transgender surgeries on minors, went out in
November to 20 organizations.

    The organizations signed onto a lawsuit against the state, which
implemented a new rule in August to no longer cover “gender-affirming”
care with Medicaid.

    “Gender-affirming” care is a euphemism for treatments and
procedures that facilitate sex changes, like hormone treatments or sex
change surgeries. -Daily Caller

A preliminary injunction was filed against the Florida law, however
federal judge Robert Hinkle denied it in October, ruling that the
issue was not Constitutional, rather, applied to the Medicaid statute.

    Transgender rights groups are suing Florida over its Medicaid ban
on gender-affirming care.

    Their argument: the ban violates the federal equal protection
clause & prevents an estimated 9,000 state Medicaid enrollees from
receiving gender-affirming care.https://t.co/aBnHK5UfdH
    — POLITICO (@politico) September 7, 2022

Subpoena recipients include;  the American Pediatric Association,
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, American Medical
Association, American Psychiatric Association, Pediatric Endocrine
Society, Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine and Yale
University, according to the Caller, which notes that Yale is included
despite not being a medical organization because Yale professors have
been involved in pushing against the new rule.

All 20 organizations have either promoted or employ individuals who
promote "gender-affirming" care for minors. The request includes
documents pertaining to deliberations involving gender dysphoria and
related care, along with policies which have been adopted, side
effects associated with those policies and treatments, and how members
voted to support said policies.

Plaintiffs in the case have argued that the Medicaid rule violates the
equal protection clause of the Constitution.