Trump's tonic masculinity: “What the fuck is this?”
Zenaan Harkness
zen at freedbms.net
Thu Jan 4 18:36:03 PST 2018
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 09:00:57AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2017/12/05/tonic-masculinity/
>
> Tonic Masculinity
>
> December 5, 2017 by CH
>
> Via Libertardian, a great snippet from the new insiders’ book about
> Trump on the campaign trail,
>
> Reading Lewandowski’s book (Let Trump be Trump).
>
> ‘When Jason Miller joined the campaign as communications
> adviser, and Paul Manafort was still the campaign’s chairman,
> the two would come up with lengthy briefing notes for Trump’s
> radio interviews containing information like “This guy’s
> located in X city or market and has been the show’s host for
> X number of years, and he has an X-thousand-person
> listenership.” Trump would look at the paper and say, “What
> the fuck is this? I don’t need all this. Just give me a phone
> number and tell me who to call.”’
>
> I lol’d. That’s the difference between President Chad and
> the Studycunt (as MPC so pungently coined it).
>
> The Virgin Studycunt vs the Chad President. Tonic
> masculinity is back in the White House and not a moment
> too soon.
Speaking of tonic masculinity, the science is in - Bear Grills is
"the man" and women flock to him - read it and rejoice/ despair as
you will :)
http://redpilltimes.com/will-2018-see-a-return-to-masculinity/?utm_source=Red+Pill+Times+Newsletter&utm_campaign=0edc9e2080-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_a30275c48d-0edc9e2080-85899125
Will 2018 see a return to masculinity?
Will Manliness Make A Comeback In 2018?
“the end result was invariably the same regardless of the
country.
While having their own setbacks, the men’s groups do
decidedly better in every case, not just because of
superior strength, but also superior organizational ability
(an evil masculine trait). In the American ‘Survivor’
version of this experiment, which had the groups in
proximity to each other, the women inevitably depended on
the men for aid.
The reality is, when push comes to shove society cannot function
without psychological traits that are decidedly masculine. This is
why matriarchal (or feminized) societies generally collapse or are
highly dysfunctional and regressive. For an example outside of the
jungle, read this article by a female entrepreneur who had a
utopian idea to build a company made up only of women – a company
which suffered complete gridlock and bankruptcy only two years
later from employee discord and laziness.
Because of the inadequacies of a culture without strong male
presence, feminism and “social justice” as ideologies instantly
lend themselves to socialism and collectivism. In fact, it’s hard
to separate one from the other.
Socialism provides the governmental and legal bubble that helps to
protect people who cannot or will not protect themselves, and
collectivism forces capable people (mostly men) to do all the hard
labor necessary to keep a system functioning and safe “for the sake
of the group,” whether they want to participate in that group or
not. In the beginning this is done through taxation, entitlement
programs and the centralizing of wages into metropolitan areas. In
the end, it is done through unabashed slavery. If you want to see
an example of this simply look up the end result of the Stalinist
and Maoist models – a productive minority is always tasked (or
forced) to feed, house and clothe the non-producing majority.
…
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list