has Julian Assange been finally silenced?

[Razer]

On 10/22/2016 04:32 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> The world is intense right now. Julian has done much up to now at least.
> Let's be thankful.
> 
> Rumour is, at the upcoming USA election, where there is no possibility that
> Trump will be elected and Hillary Clinton will with certainty be elected
> - by roughly a 51 to 49 % "marginal" victory or perhaps for the first
> time ever 50.4 to 49.6 %, that she will bring in the mark of the beast -
> that microchip in your forehead or wrist, identifying you and your
> priviledge level for purchasing food, purchasing 'luxury' items,
> travelling, voting and possibly even procreating - the breeding license
> just around the corner.
> 
> Good luck humans,
> 
> 


You think Wikileaks depends on Assange for it's existence? That's like
saying AppleCorp would die because Steve Jobs did.

It's specifically designed to be redundant. From it mirrors all the way
back through the organizational structure.. Julian Assange is, just like
Jobs, a founder, but first and foremost, a pitchman. He IS NOT necessary
to the functioning of the org.

Further, IF they killed Assange. Do you REALIZE how POPULAR that would
make WL? That's part of what keeps him alive.

Rr

> 
> 
> 
> The Silence of the Lamb
> "Clinton shows she's Caesar. She can silence anyone."
> Dr. William Wedin
> Thu, Oct 20, 2016
> http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/silence-lamb/ri17123
> 
> The author is a licensed clinical psychologist and long-time human
> rights activist who lives and practices in New York City
> 
> Who would have thought it possible? Julian was such a fighter. He was so
> fast on his feet. He made me think of Muhammad Ali. The way he could
> "float like a butterfly" and "sting like a bee."
> 
> Yet I never saw him get enraged. I never saw him lose control. No matter
> how savagely he was treated, he would always respond in a calm, rational
> way. "A splendid Judoka," (
> http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/importance-putins-remarks-judo-understanding-man-and-his-goals/ri15144
> ) Putin would say. He was like Putin--so quietly brave.
> 
> See how I lapse into the past tense already? As though he's dead. He's
> not, they say. But his voice is gone. That voice that flowed like a
> clear mountain stream from a place of quiet self-confidence in him. That
> voice will not return.
> 
> In time-- perhaps today-- more likely after the election-- another
> Julian Assange will be heard from. And he may have important things to
> say. We shall see.
> 
> But it will be not Julian the fighter. It will not be Muhammad Ali. For
> he put his faith in this man...
> 
> President Rafael Correa of Ecuador, to defend his right to speak truth
> to power--no matter the level of threat to Correa or his country.
> 
> Can you believe it? Julian actually thought that! Or he would have never
> been so cocky. And if there is one thing Hill despises, it's a real man
> who's "cocky"-- starting with Bill. But Julian still had no fear. Not
> with Correa watching his back! He could drop his grenades in Hill's path
> from early fall to the end of October. And he thought that Hill would be
> powerless to stop him.
> 
> Cause he had Ecuadorian asylum!
> 
> I think that Correa's initial, "ballsy" offer of asylum to Assange
> really went to both their heads. They were like two adolescent boys--
> pumping up each others "egos" (in the popular sense)-- till they both
> felt invincible. At least that's how Julian acted. As if he had a Putin
> to protect him. Against a woman who CREDITED HERSELF (
> http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/if-hillary-wins-will-she-kill-us-all/ri16905
> ) with Qaddafi being raped to death with a hard bayonet? She probably
> had her name stamped on the blade.
> 
> All Kerry needed to do was show Correa the "snuff" film that was made
> for Hill of Gaddafi's mutilation-murder for him to crumple before she/he
> Caesar.
> 
> 
> * What did Kerry tell Correa to do?
> 
> Not just disconnect Julian from the internet till after the election,
> I'd guess. If it had just been that, we would have heard from Julian by
> now-- some way, somehow-- quietly, rationally protesting what was done
> to him in terms of a direct assault on free speech. In short, he'd still
> have his balls. But that voice is clearly gone.
> 
> Now there is only silence. Dead silence. From him and those around him.
> 
> It's sadly obvious, I'm afraid. This courageous journalist has been
> frightened to death. Spiritually so.
> 
> And what could frighten him so? The prospect of his own actual death, I
> suspect. More specifically, the vision that Ecuador would end his
> asylum. Which would mean that Britain would swiftly extradite him to
> Sweden. Which would quickly question him and conclude that the sex he
> had engaged in so long ago was indeed consensual and that he was
> therefore free to go... to Guantanamo. Or wherever else President
> Clinton would determine he should go. There to be secretly waterboarded
> till he confessed to capital espionage. And if he won't confess to that,
> then he'll be given as fair a trial as Chelsea Manning received. With a
> certain verdict of death.
> 
> That's the only threat, I think, that could cut up a fighter like
> Assange from the inside. (Such is her Satanic knowledge.)
> 
> 
> * So how will it end?
> 
> I suspect that Assange has been made the offer that if he destroys the
> most damning emails and keeps his mouth shut for the rest of his life
> about being threatened, and then goes back to doing whatever he was
> doing before he became a whistleblower, no charges of "rape" will be
> filed against him (not that there was any evidence of such a "crime" in
> the first place); and perhaps the charges of espionage will be dropped
> too.
> 
> Or maybe not. Clinton has expressed such a strong desire to kill
> Assange (
> http://truepundit.com/under-intense-pressure-to-silence-wikileaks-secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton-proposed-drone-strike-on-julian-assange/
> ), after all. And you know how this gal with secret cojones "gets off"
> on having a real man killed at her command. Just look at how she "got
> off" at the news of Gaddafi's anal mutilation murder.
> 
> She really thinks she's The Second Coming of Julius Caesar! And then she
> was only Secretary of State. As President she will be Caesar. And she'll
> be able to order anyone's death. Even an American (
> http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/obama-respects-nothing-and-nobody-us-included/ri16666
> ). Obama has seen to that. And Assange is not even that. He's an
> Australian. That is, an untermensch, geographically. And a personal
> enemy of Hell-bound Hill-- many times over. Gaddafi she didn't even
> hate.
> 
> 
> * Caesar will be crowned!
> 
> With every network, every pundit, and every branch and agency of the
> Federal government actively involved in lying for her and covering for
> her, she will receive the laurel crown (
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurel_wreath )-- no matter how the people
> vote.
> 
> It boggles my mind. I have lived under 13 Presidents now, starting with
> FDR. And I have never seen anything like it. Even the election of 2000
> was at least an election of sorts-- if a stolen one. This crowning of
> Clinton is an act of depravity. She would do to America what was done to
> Gaddafi.
> 
> And the powers that be will make it happen....
> 
> To quote Jake Sully in Avatar (
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar_%282009_film%29 ). I know not how.
> 
> 
> * As for warm, wise, witty Julian...
> 
> To quote King Lear (
> http://www.shakespeare-online.com/plays/lear_5_3.html ) (Act 5, scene 3,
> lines 363-4):
> 
> Thou'lt come no more. 
> 
> Never, never, never, never, never!
> 
> Not the fighter we loved. This political Muhammad Ali. Who could float
> like a butterfly and sting like a bee.
> 
> She/he Hillary silenced him, alright. I don't know how. I probably never
> will. I thought it couldn't be done. But she went to work and "fixed"
> him, as we ole Kansas ranchers` used to say. Like when we'd "fix" a
> feisty bull. She "fixed" him but good.
> 
> But if she goes to "fix" Vladimir Putin, she'll be our last President.
> 
> But she seems so possessed by a lust to kill, it's my professional
> judgment she will.
>