Re: Re: Threat Model: Parents
Softy
softservant at gmail.com
Mon Jun 1 13:41:45 PDT 2015
> That's just a slippery slope to accepting the paternalism of the state,
> man. This thread continues to deliver.
>
>
trollollolollo ... one can never tell via plain text.
I suppose I should have elaborated on the distinction between Child and
State.
Evidently, confusion exists on
limits
the former should govern
with
and how the latter needs governing (and yes, at times by the former).
Now we're going to get the CPS nuts about their kids being carried away in
black vans; but that's not where I'm going. I'm laying the claim that
'developing children' need to have a certain amount of 'oversight and
governance' in their lives. I'm happy knowing various governmental and
non- are monitoring the milk my son drinks so it doesn't contain large
doses of melamine (for instance).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2244 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150601/3d0bb1f2/attachment-0002.txt>
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list