Further thoughts on Reputation Capital systems and implementation
Sunder
sunder at sunder.net
Tue Dec 4 05:17:39 PST 2001
Erm, errata ESC:%s/Mr Measels/mattd/g
----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---------------------------
+ ^ + :Surveillance cameras|Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\
\|/ :aren't security. A |share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\
<--*-->:camera won't stop a |monitor, or under your keyboard, you \/|\/
/|\ :masked killer, but |don't email them, or put them on a web \|/
+ v + :will violate privacy|site, and you must change them very often.
--------_sunder_ at _sunder_._net_------- http://www.sunder.net ------------
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Sunder wrote:
>
> Thanks for the pointer, a very good essay indeed. :)
>
> I haven't checked in any meaningful way, but that thread doesn't seem to
> have any replies from Ralph... Do you recall any details as to what would
> cause oscillations? Would be interesting to explore this.
>
> I expect that having a way to prove collusion by checking who praises
> whom, etc. would likely avoid such problems. As would I suppose personal
> observation of current behavior.
>
> Say for instance Mr. Measels manages to accumulate quite a large sum of
> positive repcap, if he spews a bunch of the lame ass CJ knockoff messages,
> I suspect most people would adjust their cached repcap's of him pretty
> quickly - At least I would. (CJ did/does write kooky messages, but at
> least they're funny...)
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list