FBI Wants to Wiretap One of Every 100 Phones in Urban Areas
clarkm at cnct.com
clarkm at cnct.com
Thu Nov 2 23:37:43 PST 1995
> On Fri, 3 Nov 1995 clarkm at cnct.kom wrote:
>
> > Thanks for this item! Two little excerpts jump out at me.
>
> Gee, I hope they didn't spook you too badly when they jumped out at you
> like that. I can tell you're a little jumpy.
Hi Rich! Thx for changing my domain, I'm sure it fooled SAIC.
> > So what is it? 1,154 wiretaps? Or 20,000?
>
> Easy: both. 1,154 wiretaps, and 20K to 25K intercepts, which includes both
> wiretaps and other interceptions, i.e., recording which phone numbers you
> call but not actually listening to the conversations.
>
> Get out of Dodge.
You get out of Dodge.
1,154 electronic surveillance orders, about 7,000 pen registers & trap/trace
plus 500 FISA warrants, all 1993 if memory serves.
Figures as supplied to EPIC, and from memory.
> By whom is the FBI being sued? What is the case number? Who are the
> lawyers? What are their Bar numbers? How many times have they been
> disciplined for bringing frivolous suits?
EPIC.
Quick!! Fire up your index!
> > What's so special about the year 2002?
>
> Obviously, it is two elections from now, when the UN will invade the US
> to impose the rule of the Anti-Christ.
>
> Oops, I wasn't supposed to say that.
But now that you have...
Check out the wiretap stats and FOIA responses at http://www.epic.org and
come back & quibble some more.
.---. .----------- * ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
/ \ __ / ------ * clark.matthews at paranet.org
/ / \(..)/ ----- * ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
////// ' \/ ` ---- *
//// / // : : --- * PERMISSION TO
\\/ / * / /` '--* COPY / REPOST
\*/ * //..\\
x-x-UU----UUx-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x
'//||\\` N E M O..M E..I M P U N E..L A C E S S I T
x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list