[cddlm] Newer versions of xsds
Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza
ayla at dsc.ufcg.edu.br
Sun Jun 5 19:13:06 CDT 2005
Hi Stuart,
thanks a lot for your attention.
I think it is a good idea to update to the most recent versions, specially of
WS-Addressing due to its use in the MuWs specification.
Have a nice week!
Ayla
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:26:28 -0400, Stuart Schaefer wrote
> Ayla,
>
> I am responsible for the component-model.xsd file. I have not
> opened it with Muse. I will try that and see what has changed/broken.
>
> The WS-Addressing schema has been a constant problem. We are aware
> of the discrepancies between the specifications. Our problem has
> been that MUWS uses a different set of specifications than some of
> the WSRF specifications we are using. Any change we make will
> seemingly cause some problem. It has been recommended that we
> update to the most recent versions of all specifications and
> continue to update as new specifications become available.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Stuart Schaefer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid
> [mailto:ayla at dsc.ufcg.edu.br]
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:39 PM
> To: Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid
> Cc: cddlm-wg at ggf.org
> Subject: Re: [cddlm] Newer versions of xsds
>
> Hello,
>
> I've found the CVS repository under:
> http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=123256
> but even replacing the component-model.xsd files, I continue with
> the same problem while using Muse:"Content model violates the unique
> particle attribution rule". I've got this problem before also with
> the xml-cdl.xsd, but replacing with the new one it did not happen.
> Has anyone else had the same problem? Is there a newer version of
> this file?
>
> Regarding ws-addressing, I've got confused, because the files point
> to an older version of ws-addressing, but they use a muws-1.0
> version that points to the new one. In a previous mail Steve has
> said that you were aware of the changes in wsa. Are you planning to
> change the documents to
>
> the new version or it is this change that will lead to even more
> internal inconsistency, as said before?
>
> Best regards,
> Ayla
>
> Ayla Debora Dantas de Souza - Projeto Ourgrid wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > please, I would like to know how I can get the newest xml-cdl.xsd and
> > component-model.xsd files?
> > Using the ones from the last versions of the specification documents,
> > after correcting namespaces, I get the error:
> >
> > "Content model violates the unique particle attribution rule"
> >
> > This error is thrown when the schema is ambiguous.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Ayla
> >
More information about the cddlm-wg
mailing list