<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Police and state prosecutors
publicly acknowledge (albeit implicitly in some cases) that they fail to
disclose their frequent use of spoofed mobile phone towers in criminal
cases, which is very much in violation of constitutional law on searches
and law addressing disclosure in criminal proceedings. They assert they can
do so because the Feds told them to. What other illegal surveillance are
they routinely conducting and using in the service of prosecutions that
they fail to disclose?</div><div><a href="http://phys.org/news/2015-04-baltimore-police-surveil-cellphones-secrecy.html?utm_source=nwletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=ctgr-item&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter">http://phys.org/news/2015-04-baltimore-police-surveil-cellphones-secrecy.html</a></div><div><br><br></div>
<br><br><img src="http://ping.answerbook.com/r/d0e1995312ee41598384b0542dc6b142/s.gif"
width="10" height="1" style="visibility:hidden;"><img src="https://ping.answerbook.com/i/d0e1995312ee41598384b0542dc6b142/s.gif"
width="10" height="1" style="visibility:hidden;"></body></html>