<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:10pt"><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); font-size: 13.3333px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span><span class="tab"> <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> </span></span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">I was subjected on a number of occasions to what should have been illegal GPS-tracker use. This kind of tracker use was finally declared a "search" within the meaning of the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution in a January 2012 US Supreme Court case, US v. Jones. The 9th Circuit Court case which the government would presumably try to use to justify that tracking was called U.S. v. McIver (9th Cir. 1999), where such a GPS tracking device was put on a vehicle seen at a location where a marijuana-grow was in operation</span>.
<a href="http:///"><span> http://www.patc.com/enewsletter/legal-answers/4-oct08.shtml </span></a> <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> (Note: This reference to the McIver case was written in 2008, 4 years prior to US v. Jones.) A Third Circuit case from 2013 that addresses this matter (and comes to the correct conclusion) is US v. Katzin (3rd Cir. 2013).</span> <a href="http:///"><span>www.eff.org/files/2013/10/22/katzin_opinion.pdf </span></a> <br></span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); font-size: 13.3333px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><br><span></span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); font-size: 13.3333px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span><span class="tab"> <span style="color: rgb(0,
0, 0);"> </span></span></span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><span>The use of the McIver case to justify the placement of the tracking device on my car(s) in 1998 and 2000 should not have worked, because unlike the McIver situation, I was actually not suspected of any crime, neither in 1998 nor 2000: I was, in effect, being stalked by Federal agents who were engaging in criminal activity against me. (Assault by Federal informant Ryan Thomas Lund, on November 25, 1997, and promulgation of a forged, fake, fraudulent "appeals" case 99-30210 from about June 20, 1999 through April 2000, and well beyond.)</span></span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); font-size: 13.3333px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> One quirk was my allegation (which due to corruption of the Tanner court as well as corrupt lawyer Robert
Leen) that the Feds had actually placed a GPS tracking device on my car, shortly after my release on April 13, 2000. Eventually, in late October, 2000, they petitioned a Federal court for a warrant to place a DIFFERENT GPS tracking device, WITHOUT alerting that court that the previous device was present. This omission of that relevant information constituted fraud on that court, because the Feds presumably argued that they 'needed' the information to find out where I was going: Since they already had one such device on my car, they obviously already knew what I was doing. <br></span></span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13.3333px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> And, if they would have argued that placing such a device on my car was 'legal', then why would they have had to
obtain a warrant </span>in late October 2000? Why not simply use the information they had obtained from April 2000-October 2000? The answer, in hindsight, is simple: The Feds had no justification at all to place a tracking device on my car during and after April 2000: For them to use that information about October 2000, they would have had to explain why the tracking device had been placed as early as April 2000. That they could not do, unless they admitted that they had no articulateable reason to track me during that time. <br></span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13.3333px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span> Note: On about November 21, 2000 I told my (corrupt, appointed) lawyer Robert Leen about my suspicion that they had been tracking me from April-October 2000; I had a right to have
all such information available to me at my "trial". But, Leen wasn't really acting as my 'first line of defense': Leen was acting as the GOVERNMENT'S 'first line of offense'. Because Leen wouldn't act to obtain that (secret) trackig device information in 'discovery' (legal term of art, requiring government to turn over information before trial) I sent a letter about December 8, 2000 to Judge Tanner, telling him that I 'fired' Leen for his deliberate negligence. Tanner did not allow me to fire Leen, and I was denied the ability to present this (and essentially any other) evidence at the "trial". While you may have heard snippets about how my trial was 'fixed', the reality was far worse than that.<br></span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); font-size: 13.3333px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0,
0);"> Any questions?</span></span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13.3333px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Jim Bell</span><br></span></div><br><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 10pt;"><div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div class="y_msg_container"><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;"><br><a href="http://www.infowars.com/feds-may-require-vehicle-location-tracking-in-new-cars/" target="_blank">http://www.infowars.com/feds-may-require-vehicle-location-tracking-in-new-cars/ </a><br></span><font size="4"><span style="font-family: times new
roman,new york,times,serif;"><span><a href="http://www.infowars.com/feds-may-require-vehicle-location-tracking-in-new-cars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link to Feds Consider Vehicle Location Tracking in New Cars">Feds Consider Vehicle Location Tracking in New Cars</a></span></span></font>
<span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div class="textsize" style="float:right;">
<ul><li>
<table>
<tbody><tr>
<td><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;"><a href="http://www.infowars.com/feds-may-require-vehicle-location-tracking-in-new-cars/print/" title="" rel="nofollow"><img class="WP-PrintIcon" src="http://www.infowars.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-print/images/printer_famfamfam.gif" alt="" title="" style="border: 0px;"></a> </span>
</td>
<td><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAlexJonesChannel" target="_blank"><img src="http://static.infowars.com/2010/templateimages/youtube.png" alt="The Alex Jones Channel" width="20" height="21"></a></span></td>
<td><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;"><a href="http://xml.nfowars.net/Alex.rss" target="_blank"><img src="http://static.infowars.com/2010/templateimages/podcast.png" alt="Alex Jones Show podcast" width="20" height="23"></a></span></td>
<td><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;"><a href="http://prisonplanet.tv/" target="_blank"><img src="http://static.infowars.com/2010/templateimages/pptv.png" alt="Prison Planet TV" width="20" height="20"></a></span></td>
<td><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;"><a href="http://twitter.com/realalexjones" target="_blank"><img src="http://static.infowars.com/2010/templateimages/twitter.png" alt="Infowars.com Twitter" width="20" height="20"></a></span></td>
<td><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEmerickJones" target="_blank"><img src="http://static.infowars.com/2010/templateimages/facebook.png" alt="Alex Jones' Facebook" width="19" height="20"></a></span></td>
<td><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;"><a href="http://www.infowarsshop.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://static.infowars.com/2010/templateimages/cart.png" alt="Infowars store" width="25" height="20"></a></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</li></ul>
</div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">Proposal may lead to more accidents, mileage taxes and tickets for “recorded traffic violations”</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;"><b>Kit Daniels</b><br>
Infowars.com<br>
January 1, 2014</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">In a few weeks, federal officials may require new vehicles to have
trackable GPS “safety” devices which could be hacked to cause automobile
accidents and may even usher in mileage taxes.</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div id="attachment_97044" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 340px"><br><div class="wp-caption-text"><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">With the V2V device, the GPS location for all new cars could be recorded. Credit: Minesweeper via Wiki</span></div></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is spending the
next couple of weeks mulling over its decision to install
vehicle-to-vehicle communications – known as V2V for short – into new
vehicles which would allow them to “talk” to each other through GPS data
under the guise of “accident prevention,” <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/feds-require-cars-talk-avoid-crashes/print?id=21385048" target="_blank">according to ABC News</a>.</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">However, one official involved with the government study of the
devices admitted that hackers could abuse the system to create mass
havoc on the road.</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">“Who has access and how do you secure the data?” David Wise of the Government Accountability Office asked.</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">He even said that the V2V would rely on GPS data that can be used to easily track a vehicle – and thus the occupants inside.</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">“Privacy is a real challenge,” Wise said.</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">This is refreshing honesty from a government official.</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">The fact that the V2V system could be hacked to cause high-speed
pile-ups exposes the political lie that these devices were designed to
prevent accidents. In fact, bureaucrats want the V2V installed in
vehicles in order to track Americans like animals in another sick
extension of the domestic spy grid pioneered by the NSA.</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">With vehicle tracking, big government politicians could also accomplish their goal of taxing drivers by every mile driven.</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">Lawmakers could even use this sort of technology to pass laws that
allow local governments to mail drivers tickets for “recorded traffic
violations” as they already do with red light cameras.</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">And to really stick it into drivers even further, the costs for the
GPS technology will be tacked onto the price of new cars – forcing
Americans to pay for their own enslavement.</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">
</span><div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;">Take a look at the following articles to see for yourself the hidden agenda behind the V2V technology:</span></div><span style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;"></span>=======================end of quote============================<br><br><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></body></html>