USA 2020 Elections: Thread

[grarpamp]

> https://twitter.com/NateLF4/status/1718787546522808551
> https://twitter.com/ElectionWiz

50,000 ballots out of 2.1 million were randomly selected and tested. 0
of them were on VoteSecure paper.

https://rumble.com/vn4kgx-the-american-faces-behind-the-audit.html

Straight from Runbeck Printing, if they printed ALL PRODUCED ballots
on Rolland 80LB VoteSecure Paper, that Maricopa used for ALL of their
ballots AS THEY SAY, then WHY was their 19 different types/weights of
paper Chinese whistleblower Vinness A. Ollervides has confirmed that
as many as five million fake ballots were printed in communist China
and shipped to North America to be used in the 2020 election.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/10/general-flynn-americans-see-truth-our-ruling-class/

https://x.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1718311317772128449

https://bit.ly/bvfraud

@Rasmussen_Poll
"All counted ballots" in Maricopa County are printed on 80lb
VoteSecure ballot paper. Except over 200,000 weren't. 10 different
types/weights of paper were found by the volunteers who examined the
2.1M ballots. But Joe Biden 'won' Arizona in 2020.
rumble.com/vn4kgx-the-americ…

@kylenabecker
Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election
Challenges Were 'Baseless' An Election Integrity review conducted on
92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear
majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for
the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump
campaign. The election review noted the cases decided on the merits
and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural
issues. "Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going
forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial
authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to
make a difference)." The list of court cases decided on the merits,
meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and,
if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery,"
as well as the links to the case information, can be found below.
“You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times
reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election
challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+
election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were
actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those
30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.” The case
entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm
the statuses and the rulings. It is debatable whether affirmative
rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to
Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden. The pivotal lawsuit
may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that
a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes,
because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was
denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its
original jurisdiction. Furthermore, many states have since decided
that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded
"Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed. It is
up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the
deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the
election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits
paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed
and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of
election integrity. Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal
challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”