Coronavirus: Thread

[grarpamp]

'I Had To Stand Up And Try To Do Something:' Professor Of Medicine On
Suing School Over Vaccine Mandate

https://www.theepochtimes.com/i-had-to-stand-up-and-try-to-do-something-professor-of-medicine-on-suing-school-over-vaccine-mandate_4074750.html

https://brownstone.org/articles/79-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acquired-immunity-to-covid-19-documented-linked-and-quoted/
https://policy.ucop.edu/doc/5000695/SARS-CoV-2_Covid-19
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21094836-kheriaty-lawsuit
https://www.theepochtimes.com/covid-19-vaccines-offer-more-protection-than-previous-infection-study_3937223.html
https://www.theepochtimes.com/sen-johnson-health-agencies-are-ignoring-natural-immunity_4008940.html
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abg9175
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.15.21252192v1
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33803014/


Dr. Aaron Kheriaty reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic like many other
medical experts. He worked long hours as the United States tried to
grapple with the new disease. He had too many conversations with
family members whose loved ones were dying from it.
Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, a professor of psychiatry at UC Irvine's School of
Medicine, is seen in Irvine, Calif., on Oct. 27, 2021. (Zhen Wang/The
Epoch Times)

But as time wore on, he started noticing a pattern in public health
decisions that seemed to diverge from traditional medical ethics,
including an insistence that people at little risk from COVID-19 get a
vaccine.

Kheriaty is now on suspension from the University of California,
Irvine, (UCI) and challenging the school’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate in
court.

“I had to stand up and try to do something about it,” the professor of
psychiatry and director of the UCI Health’s Medical Ethics Program
said on The Epoch Times’ “American Thought Leaders.”

UCI spokespeople declined to comment for this story.
‘Liberating’

Kheriaty contracted COVID-19, the disease caused by Covid-19 in
mid-2020. His infection was confirmed by two different tests from two
independent labs. His five children and wife also contracted the
disease. They all recovered, with none requiring hospital care.

“It was, for me, actually a very liberating experience afterward,
because I didn’t have to worry about the illness anymore. I knew the
science on natural immunity,” Kheriaty said.

Natural immunity refers to when people contract COVID-19 and recover.
Dozens of studies have documented that these individuals enjoy strong
immunity against CCP virus re-infection. Some of the studies suggest
the immunity is superior to that provided by COVID-19 vaccines,
particularly the Johnson & Johnson one.

“I knew that at that point, I was among the safest people to be
around, I didn’t have to worry about transmitting the infection to my
patients,” Kheriaty said.

He continued taking precautions, wearing personal protective equipment
like masks as required at the hospital. But he was confident he didn’t
pose a risk to others, which served as a relief.

That relief turned into disbelief when, around a year later, the
University of California system, which includes UCI, imposed a
COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
Opt-Out is Temporary

The mandate (pdf) included a natural immunity opt-out, but only
temporarily. People who recovered from COVID-19 were told they would
only be exempt from the mandate for up to 90 days after their
diagnosis.

University officials cited the Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
which alleges that the antibody tests it has authorized “are not
validated to evaluate specific immunity or protection from SARS-CoV-2
infection.”

SARS-CoV-2 is another name for the CCP virus.

“For this reason, individuals who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 or
had an antibody test are not permanently exempt from vaccination,”
officials said.

The mandate violated rights outlined in the U.S. Constitution’s
Fourteenth Amendment, including equal protection and substantive due
process, Kheriaty’s lawsuit asserts.

“Plaintiff is naturally immune to SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, plaintiff is
at least as equally situated as those who are fully vaccinated with a
COVID-19 vaccine, yet defendants deny plaintiff equal treatment and
seek to burden Plaintiff with an unnecessary violation of bodily
integrity to which plaintiff does not consent in order to be allowed
to continue to work at UCI,” it states.

The situation creates two classes, vaccinated and unvaccinated, when a
more reasonable division would be those who are immune and those who
are not, Kheriaty believes.

“What kind of discriminatory policies do we have in place that are
excluding someone like me from the workplace when I’m 99.8 percent
protected against reinfection whereas someone who got the Johnson &
Johnson vaccine, by the company’s own data that they submitted to the
FDA, is 67 percent protective against COVID infection?” he said.
Whose Burden?

Kheriaty initially planned to get a COVID-19 vaccine. Now he’s working
to change the narrative around mandates.

Some say proposed natural immunity opt-outs for the mandates would be
make it much more difficult to ascertain who meets the threshold,
versus a vaccine mandate with no lasting provision for post-infection.

Most mandates across the country don’t have alternatives for people
who had COVID-19 and recovered.

Kheriaty proposes putting the burden of proof on people who want to opt out.

“Just have them go get the testing on their own time. You don’t have
to administer the T-cell test or the antibody test. You don’t have to
go dig up their old medical record establishing that they’ve already
had COVID,” he said.

“Just ask them to bring that in and sign off on that as a kind of
immunity passport.”
Side Effects

The population of those who recovered and still got a vaccine is known
as having “hybrid immunity.”

A large part of the medical health establishment, including all
federal public health agencies, downplay natural immunity. They say it
exists but that hybrid immunity is better.

“I’m not denying at all that people who get infected and recover have
a considerable degree of immunity,” Dr. Anthony Fauci, the longtime
director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,
said last month. “We also know—and I think we should not let this pass
without saying it—that when you get infected and recover, a) you get a
good degree of immunity, but b) when you get vaccinated, you
dramatically increase that protection, which is something that’s
really quite good.”

A spokesman for Fauci’s agency told The Epoch Times in an email that
he sourced from several studies, including one from researchers at the
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle. They found that a
COVID-19 vaccine based on messenger RNA given following COVID-19
infection boosted neutralizing antibodies.

Many studies, however, show the immunity post-infection is already
sky-high for many, leading to questions about why the recovered would
then go get a vaccine that, like every jab, has side effects.

Kheriaty worries about other research that seems to show vaccine
recipients with natural immunity experience side effects at a higher
frequency than those who are not immune who get a shot.

“There are now about five independent studies that strongly suggest
that individuals that already have natural immunity, when you
vaccinate them, the risk of vaccine adverse events or vaccine side
effects is higher for that group,” the professor said. “They have
higher risk of side effects from the vaccine. It’s not going to help
the people around them because natural immunity already is
sterilizing, [yet] we don’t yet have any COVID vaccines that offer
sterilizing immunity.”